Palaces For The People
Monday, June 21, 2004
Busting corrupt scientists - How Industry Corrupted "Heidelberg Appeal"

The Corrupt Heidelberg Appeal, and the corrupt S. Fred Singer


Heidelberg Appeal to Heads of States and Governments  Date: 18 Mar 1993 (est.)

Length: 1 page

Scanned, barely legible, copy of "Heidelberg Appeal" deceptively crafted to mislead non-conspirator scientists and policy leaders that bad science comes from industry enemies, whereas, the organizers of this appeal were industry paid deception agents hired to deceive by using fraudulent science.


(Mayo Clinic Document)

SUBJECT: The Heidelberg Appeal  Date: 23 Mar 1993

Length: 1 page

Attaches materials regarding the Heidelberg Appeal, International Center for a Scientific Ecology (ICSE), and two ICSE conferences. Offers background on ICSE, noting the tobacco industry's "discreet" involvement "through the French NMA." States that the ICSE provides views to international government bodies regarding "what constitutes sound environmental science with regard to particular issues." Comments that involvement with ICSE comes at opportune time given President Clinton's sympathy to the coalition's messages.

Named Person:

* Lee, Peter N. (Biostatistician) Frequently funded by the tobacco industry to criticize and discount published and epidemiological studies that linked between tobacco smoking and health damage.

* Borelli, Thomas J. (Mgr., Corporate Scientific Affairs, PM 1990) Manager of Corporate Scientific Affairs for Philip Morris in 1990. Also worked for PM Corporate Services in Brussels.

* Clinton, William Jefferson (President, 1993-2001)

Named Organization:

* International Center for a Scientific Ecology

* IHT = Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University

Site:  MN Depository

Company:  Philip Morris

Date Loaded:  19 Nov 2001

Author:  Wirz, Gerard (PM Corporate Services, Brussels c.1990-94) Gerard Wirz worked for Philip Morris Corporate Services, Inc. in Brussels. (PMI's Introduction to Privilege Log and Glossary of Names, Estate of Burl Butler v. PMI, et al, April 19, 1996)

See image in Philip Morris Documents:


SUBJECT: The Heidelberg Appeal  Date: 23 Mar 1993

Length: 1 page

Text of Scanned Document

To: Meeting Participants

From: Gerard WIRZ

Date: March 23, 1993

SUBJECT: The Heideiberg Appeal

Attached are some materials regarding an international coaIition of scientists based in Paris.

1.   The "Heidelberg Appeal" and the coalition: This has now been endorsed by over 2,500 scientists, economists and intellectuals, including 70 Nobel Laureates. As an outgrowth, a new institution called the International Center for a Scientific Ecology has been established in Paris to provide views to govemment officials around the world on what constontiutes sound environmental science with regard to particular issues.

2.    ICSE May Conference in Paris: On May 10 the Center for a Scientific Ecology will hold a conference to review the no-threshold and linerality assumptions often used in cancer risk assessment. ETS is on the agenda as one of the case examples, with P.N. Lee making a presentation. (Appeal, provisional conference agenda and subscription form are attached)

3.    ICSE May Conference in Washington DC: Later in May a similar conference will be held in Washington DC. I am working with Tom Borelli to INDIRECTLY support the conference.


This coalition has its roots in the asbestos industry, but has become a broad and independent movement in a littlc bit less than a year. We are involved with the coalition through the French NMA, but we are being discreet because some of the coalition members are concerned about a "tobacco connection'.

Our srategy is to continue discreetly supporting the coalition and help it grow in size and credibility. The timing is particularly opportune because of Bill Clinton's sympathy to the messages of the coalition (see attached IHT article).

If you would like more information on how to help support thc movement, pIease contact me or Tom Borelli on the US side.


Heidelberg Appeal to Heads of States and Governments  Date: 19930318/R

Length: 1 page


Date: 18 May 1993

Length: 1 page


Rue Joseph II, 166

1040 Brussels

To:    Distribution List                                   Date: March 18, 1993

From: Gerard Wirz  CC: Matt Winokur

Please find attached a copy of the Heidelberg Appeal and the announcement for a restricted

intexnational scientific seminar which will be held on May 10 in Paris.

The purpose of this coalition is to forewarn the authorities against decisions which axe supported

by pseudo-scientific or false,non-relevant data.

I will brief you on the background of this coalition when we meet on March 23, in Lausanne.

Distribution List

Tony Andrade

StiLf Carlson

Peter Martin

Helmut Reif

Clare Purcell


Facsimile Coversheet  Date: 18 Mar 1993

Length: 1 page


(Philip Morris Documents)

Scientific Integrity in the Public Policy Process Semi-Final Program 930524 - 930525 the Madison Hotel 15th and M Streets, Nw Washington, D.C.  Date: 19930525/D

Length: 2 pages


Date: 11 Oct 1993

Length: 1 page


International Center for A Scientific Ecology Meeting  Date: 27 Apr 1993

Length: 1 page


(RJ Reynold Tobacco Company files)

the "No Threshold" Argument.  Date: Sep 1993

Length: 2 pages

Named Person:

* Delaney

* Ames

* Intl Center For Scientific Ecology

9.   A 1993 International Conference concluded that threshold doses are likely to exist, and condemned the Delaney Amendment as making no scientific sense.

10.  They affirmed that legislative decisions should not be supported by pseudo-scientific arguments or false and non-relevant data.

... The "No Threshold' Argument

Cancer causing substances (carcinogens) exist everywhere - in the food we eat,

the water we drink, the very air we breathe - they are ubiquitous and unavoidable.

But most have only been shown to be carcinogens in high-dose animal

experiments: whether they cause cancer in humans at low doses is speculation.

Because ETS is claimed to contain traces of such substances, and because it is

assumed sometimes that there is no safe level of exposure to carcinogens, it has

been suggested that inhaling someone else's tobacco smoke may cause lung

cancer in nonsmokers (the 'no threshold' argument).

... A Conference on Low Doses Of Carcinogens was held under the auspices of the

International Center for Scientific Ecology (Paris 1993) at which many professors

of science argued against the notion of a no safe dose level.

September 1993


(Philip Morris Tobacco Company files)

International Center for A Scientific Ecology Guidelines for the Seminar on Linear Relationship for Risk Assessment of Low Doses of Carcinogens Date: Mar 18, 1993

Length: 1 page

* asbestos - MacDonald

* arsenic - Stohrer

* vinyl chloride monomer - Freiesleben

* DDT (...)

* saccarin - Cohen

* passive smoking P.N. Lee


(Philip Morris Tobacco Company files)

Is the Concept of Linear Relationship Between Dose and Effect Still A Valid Model for Assessing Risk Related to Low Doses of Carcinogens? A Restricted International Scientific Seminar 930510 - Paris (France)  Date: 17 Feb 1993

Length: 5 pages


Paris Meeting  Date: 07 May 1993

Length: 1 page

Tobacco Advisory Council Fax

Subject:              PARIS MEETING

I enclose information on the International Center for a Scientific Ecology Meeting to be held in Paris on

the 10th May. Peter Lee is participating. He will be sending us further Information and a report on the

meeting for the Scientific Committee which I will let you have when it comes.



Guidelines for the Seminar on Linear Relationship for Risk Assessment of Low Doses of Carcinogens  Date: 10 Feb 1993

Length: 1 page


(Philip Morris Tobacco Company files)

PM / RJR Tobacco Task Force  Date: 06 Jul 1993

Length: 89 pages

page 20:

Project Science Spokesperson

Lead Responsibility: PM: Tom Borelli





Time Line: -Searching

Description: Identify one or more scientists willing to speak on the ETS subject in support of our position. Place them in speaking opportunities.

Victor Han: Free up TI scientists; identify others for media.

Lead Responsibility:           PM: Victor Han, Steve Parrish Burson-Marsteller

                              R JR:


    *TB - Encouraged speakers participating at the George Mason University International

     Institute's Scientific Integrity Conference to raise the ETS risk assessment as an example

     of bad science. The conference was video taped and it will be reveiwed for statements

     made on ETS. The video can be used to educate policy makers on the use of bad science

     and public policy.

    -PM TB - APCO/Burson Marsteller are identifying various environmental

     symposia where ETS can be raised and various policy group speakers will

     will be reviewed as possible candidates.

    -Still looking


(Philip Morris Tobacco Company files)

Scientific Integrity in the Public Policy Process Semi-Final Program 930524 - 930525 the Madison Hotel 15th and M Streets, Nw Washington, D.C.  Date: 19930525/D

Length: 2 pages


THE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR A SCIENTIFIC ECOLOGY The Center has been created at the beginning of  Date:

Length: 2 pages



The Center has been created at the beginning of 1993 under the French law for non-profit organizations. The purpose is to answer the request from a number of the Heidelberg Appeal signatories in view to extend its impact in examining actual issues the scientific community is confronted with.


Designer front group - TASSC  Date: Mar 28, 1994

Length: 8 pages

page 4:

B.    Expansion through the Supporters of the Heidelberg Appeal

The Heidelberg Appeal, an offshoot of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, currently has over 2,500 signatures from 96 countries. This appeal is a statement of principles that advocates the use of sound science -- not

emotions or irrational preconceptions-- as a basis for international policy

page 5:

decisions. The supporters of the Appeal are a loose-knit group. The effort to expand the support of the Appeal is handled through Dr. M. Saloman of International Center for Scienific Ecology (Paris).

      In discussions with a number of our scientific supporters and with Dr. Fred Singer (a member of the Board of the International Center for Scientific Ecology), there is belief that this initial support could be organized into a more "formal movement" internationally.

      The benefits of attempting to use this group as a basis of extending TASSC include:

             Several of TASSC's scientists have signed the Appeal, providing

             the opporunity to approach the supporters with a

             "peer to peer"~ approach, i.e., a "Dear Colleague letter.

             The supporters of the Appeal are truly a divese group of

             scientists, representing a variety of diciplines and countries.

             By working with this group, we might be able to ensure that

             European TASSC is a broad-based group.

             In signing the Appeal, this group expressed support of our basic

             message. We know they will be receptive to the mission and

             goals of TASSC.

     C. Expansion Through Other Existing Groups

We are aware of a number of trade associations that are interested in the use of sound science. Through both the GCI/Grey and the Burson networks, we could identify existing companies, trade associations and organizations that may have an interest in promoting the use of sound science. Some of the associations that might be approached by Grey/GCI

page 6:

...         GCI/Grey's expertise includes work with a number of clients, including the following industries impacted by science and environmental policy decisions: chemical, pharmaceutical, nuclear, waste management and motor industries, power generation, bio tech products, packaging and detergents, paint. They have advised clients on a number of issues, including:

    *   Agricultural manufacturing

    *   Animal testing

    *   Chlorine

    *   Dioxin~

    *   Toxic waste

    *   Ozone/CFC's

    *   Power generation

    *   Coastal pollution

    *   Lead in gasoline

    *   Polyurethanes

    *   Lubricants


Proposal for the Organisation of the Whitecoat Project  Date: 22 Feb 1988 (est.)

Length: 4 pages


Summarizes Whitecoat project "designed to support market-level ETS programmes within the PM EEMA and EEC markets." Outlines objectives of ETS programmes e.g. resisting smoking restrictions and restoring social acceptability of smoking. Mentions the Whitecoat Project is comprised of a Pro-active element, i.e. "to generate a body of scientific and technical knowledge in the field of ETS" etc., and a Reactive element: "to provide scientific and technical resources to challenge existing laws etc." Provides an organizational overview detailing what each component is responsible for, designating components as A, B, C, D. Includes ICIAR organizational chart.

Type:  Report

Named Organization:  ACVA

Center for Indoor Air Research (CIAR) (Industry formed/funded air research organzation)

      Nonprofit organization funded by the tobacco industry. CIAR was formed in March 1988 by tobacco companies "to sponsor "high-quality research on indoor air issues and to facilitate communication of research findings to the broad scientific community."

Covington & Burling (Tobacco Industry law firm)

      Tobacco industry law firm. Was involved in organizing the Whitecoat Project.

International Cenre for Indoor Air Research (ICIAR)

INFOTAB (Int'l Tobacco Information Clearinghouse for industry, NMAs)

      ICOSI (International Commlssion on Smoking Issues) was formed around 1978. It was reorganized in 1980 or 1981 as INFOTAB. Infotab is an information clearinghouse that collects articles and legislatlve information. Data Is funnelled to Infotab by members of the industry. The founding companies are R.J. Reynolds International, BAT, Philip Morris, Reemtsma, Rothmans, Imperial andGallaher. The last three companies dropped in and out. A company had to give three years' notice to resign. BAT gave its notice to resign in late 1987 in conjunction with B&W's resignation from TI. BAT and B&W's resignations were partially because of the Barclay controversy. The companies pay the Infotab dues, but the beneficiaries include the national manufacturing associations(NMAs) . NMAs worldwide receive newsletters from Infotab. They can call and get information on various topics. G.C. Hargrove of BAT was on Infotab.

Philip Morris Incorporated (Philip Morris U.S.A.) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Philip Morris Co., Inc.)

      A wholly-owned subsidiary of Philip Morris Co., Inc.

Shook Hardy & Bacon (Tobacco Industry law firm)

      Tobacco Industry law firm based in Kansas City, KS.


The ETS Program for 1991  Date: 1990 (est.)

Length: 6 pages

This 1991 budget from the Philip Morris (PM) collection describes tobacco industry activities to "maintain the controversy" on secondhand smoke.

Operation/Project:  Project Whitecoat (Scientific Witness Project)

      Global project to recruit respected scientists in developed countries around the world who would criticize the science on secondhand smoke, cast doubt on whether ETS harms people and "prolong the controversy" about the effects of environmental tobacco smoke on nonsmokers.

Named Organization:  BCIA, Business Council on Indoor Air (PM funded, industry-formed indoor air quality group-)

      Formed in 1988 "to address a growing mutual concern of a number of private companies representing a wide spectrum of industries about the serious national problem of poor indoor air quality." (2023920674/0683). Funded by Philip Morris (2023856052/6057)

Center for Indoor Air Research (CIAR) (Industry formed/funded air research organzation)

      Nonprofit organization funded by the tobacco industry. CIAR was formed in March 1988 by tobacco companies "to sponsor "high-quality research on indoor air issues and to facilitate communication of research findings to the broad scientific community."

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)

International Flight Attendants Association

INBIFO, Intitut Fur Biologische Forschung (Philip Morris' secret biological research lab in Europe)

      "INBIFO" stands for Institut Fur Biologische Forschung, or Institute for Biological Research. It is located in Germany. Philip Morris acquired Inbifo on June 30, 1971. Its stated mission was "quantitative biological poduct evaluation" by using "comprehensive toxicological and physiological testing. Major activities are listed as: product evaluation and modifications, product ingredients and ETS-related technical knowledge and smoke components. Inhalation toxicology was a key feature of Inbifo. (Derived from Bates No. 2505235055/5088)


Organization of Contacts with Whitecoats  Date: 16 Nov 1987

Length: 1 page




Project Brass: A Plan of Action for the ETS Issue  Date: 23 Mar 1993

Length: 47 pages

This document, Project Brass: A Plan of Action for the ETS Issue, written by the Leo Burnett Company for Philip Morris (PM), reveals the potency of the threat the issue of Environmental Tobacco Smoke, or ETS, posed to the tobacco industry:

"For the first time, report provides alleged proof of link between ETS and cancer...Shifts argument from 'personal choice' to 'smoking is unhealthy for everyone'...Arms antis with scientific proof to go to OSHA...Fuels emotional hysteria of antis...Will likely accelerate efforts to prohibit/restrict smoking further...Alters image of smoker [from] 'Bad for him/her,' to 'smoker is bad for all of us.'...Puts further pressure on volume/revenue/profit trends."

The strategies Burnett proposed to fight the ETS issue were: to broaden the ETS issue to encompass total indoor air quality (and thus deflect attention away from the ETS issue), to use "credible third parties" to help the company fight public health measures, and to "create a sense of doubt about the EPA ETS report" [Page 30].


[Scientists in ETS Program]  Date: 20 Oct 1992

Length: 1 page

This internal memorandum from the Tobacco Institute reveals the increasing difficulty the tobacco industry has had in recruiting and retaining credible medical and scientific professionals to publish papers and testify on their behalf to help "maintain the controversy" on secondhand smoke. Scientific and medical professionals who testify publicly on behalf of the tobacco industry risk losing their own credibility. This memo discusses the problem of attrition among medical, statistical, toxicological and epidemiological "experts" that the Tobacco Institute lined up to publish papers and testify at public hearings in its "Scientific Witness Program."


Ets  Date: 11 Jul 1989

Length: 10 pages

Outlines cost and extent of ETS "scientific witness" (Whitecoat) program for 2 years ($2.5 million, not including legal costs). To G. Bible from Andrew Whist, July, 1989.

page 7:


i. Total Number of Scientists Recruited: 70

EEC                      45

EEMA        9

Asia        8

Australia - 3

Canada        5

2. Affiliated with universities: 49

EEC                      31

EEMA        7

Asia        6

Australia - 1

Canada        4

3. Private consultants: 21

EEC                      14

EEMA        2

Asia        2

Australia - 2

Canada .... 1

4. Disciplines covered:



Pulmonary Medicine

Occupational Hygiene



Risk Assessment



Building Systems

5. Average annual fees:

No retainers paid. Compensation on basis of time

spent. $15,000 to $20,000 per year on average.

6. Scientific Conferences (not including press briefings):

EEC                      12

EEMA         6

Asia        7

Australia - 0

L/A         6

Canada      5


The ETS Program for 1991  Date: 1990 (est.)

Length: 6 pages

"Science Objectives" were estimated to cost a whopping $16,688,400 and included "Develop and support activities and research which maintain the controversy..." about secondhand smoke and "Maintain research provide support for our position."

Among the "Science Objectives" were "Develop[ing] and support[ing] activities and research which maintain the controversy" about tobacco smoke.


Invited Panelists 930510 Seminar  Date: 18 Mar 1993 (est.)

Length: 2 pages

Two months before a pseudo-science conference, this document is deposited in Philip Morris Tobacco Company files. This kind of detail over every element of the planning and conduct of the May 10, 1993 ICSE conference is proof positive that the conference was tobacco supported and operated to generate usable results in science deceptions by tobacco companies. The conference was fraudulent science by craft and design.

Taken together with the AdTI phoney science reports, S. Fred Singer is caught in an inescapable trap of his own making, that he perverted science to advance serial murder corporations to keep killing longer.


'is the Concept of Linear Relationship Between Dose and Effect Still A Valid Model for Assessing Risk Related to Low Doses of Carcinogens?' Notes on An International Scientific Ecology Held on 9030510 in Paris  Date: 13 May 1993

Length: 12 pages

Notes on an International Scientific Seminar

         organized by the

International Center for a Scientific Ecology

     held on i0 Nay 1993 in Paris

Author : P N Lee

Date : 13.5.93

... Having said that, it was notable that no members of environmental organizations had been invited to the conference, so counter-arguments were often not made. ...


Thoughts on Tassc Europe  Date: 25 Mar 1994

Length: 8 pages


Guidelines for the Seminar on Linear Relationship for Risk Assessment of Low Doses of Carcinogens  Date: 10 Feb 1993

Length: 1 page

Related Documents:

* 2025498347

* 2025498348 Heidelberg Appeal to Heads of States and Governments

* 2025498350-8355 Is the Concept of Linear Relationship Between Dose and Effect Still A Valid Model for Assessing Risk Related to Low Does of Carcinogens? A Restricted International Scientific Seminar 930510 - Paris (France)

* 2025498356-8357 Invited Panelists 930510 Seminar

Named Organization:

* Intl Center for A Scientific Ecology

* Seminar Linear Relationship Risk Assess


Busting corrupt scientists - William Hazeltine, AdTI, S. Fred Singer and Tobacco

William Hazeltine, AdTI, S. Fred Singer and Tobacco Serial Murder corporations

There is more than one Hazeltine in the world. There is even more than one W.E. Hazeltine. There are also Hazelton and Hazletons in the world. This collection of links attempts to correctly identify one single Hazeltine, named William Hazeltine, collaborator in a science fraud perpetrated by S. Fred Singer in 1994.

The event in question was a "science" report commisioned by Lorillard Tobacco Company and the Tobacco Institute as one of a series of events which was a part of a much large deception operation. Ultimately a report was published, and both Singer's and Hazeltine's names were attached.

The key issue is identifying if this "Hazeltine" is the same one associated with other science corruption elsewhere.

The Hazeltine associated with Singer is presumed the same one associated with Singer one year earlier, in the fraudulent "Heidelberg Appeal" coalition with roots in the asbestos industry of the prior year. A number of tobacco documents mention both the "Heidelberg Appeal" and the "International Center for Scientific Ecology" as being one and the same thing. Presenters at this pseudo-science conference included Singer and Hazeltine, and the subject matter was identical in the meeting as was covered in the "Science, Economics, and Environmental Policy: a Critical Examination" Alexis de Tocqueville Institution report.

Because of the tobacco-angle, it seems safe to assume that this early 1993 list of supporters for TASSC is the same Hazeltine. (Page 2)

Since we have linkage identifying this Hazeltine with DDT, and with ICSE, and with TASSC, it seems certain that the Hazeltine cited five times on the tobacco-created website page is the same Hazeltine. One ironic fact, #82 "Changes in climate (higher temperatures and decreasing precipitation) were blamed for the gradual disappearance of peregrines from the Rocky Mountains." When it is convenient Steven J. Milloy will charge Climate Change and excessive warming to pergrin falcon decreases rather than admit that DDT played a role, but Milloy will insist there has never been any harmful climate warming anywhere else.

A William Hazeltine is cited on this OISM webpage " As to the cancer fears, the late William Hazeltine, Ph.D., presented an analysis at a seminar sponsored by the International Center for Scientific Ecology on May 10, 1993. In his assessment, evidence for the carcinogenicity of DDT is limited and weak. Nonmalignant hepatomas were induced in mice fed maximum tolerated doses of DDT for their entire life. Hazeltine was skeptical of a study by Wolff et al. (JNCI 1993;85:648-652) purporting to show higher levels of organochlorine residues in women with breast cancer. The levels were at the limit of detection of the gas chromatography system used."

OISM is linked to Frederick Seitz and a counterfeit anti-Kyoto petition issued jointly. Seitz is Vice President of S. Fred Singer's "Science and Environmental Policy Project" ("SEPP"), and a long-time appendage on the tobacco-industry payrolls. Since there is a good certainty this is the same Hazeltine we know that he has a laboratory and does cancer research with DDT.

From the mounting collection of facts gradually assembling through dilligent investigation, it is certain that this is the exact same Hazeltine discussed in a 1978 book, The Pesticide Conspiracy, Dr. Robert van den Bosch, Doubleday 1978. In describing an industry-front organization, the California Educational Foundation on Agriculture and Food Production (CEFAFP), this description fits out Hazeltine: "William Hazeltine, mosquito abater and vociferous proponent of DDT".

It seems likely that another mention of Hazeltine matches the one under scruitiny, from an internet article titled 'HOW THE BIODIVERSITY TREATY WENT DOWN': "Hugh W. Ellsaesser and William Hazeltine, both of whom are serve on the board of the Environmental Conservation Organization, a "wise use" network of hundreds of organizations (1994)".

Hazeltine is still listed with the organization, ten years after his death, though with (dec) after his name.

Hazeltine is author of an article posted on an Argentinian website with an organication name that evokes the fraudulent ICSE mentioned above: Foundation Argentiean Ecology Scientific (FAEC). Dr. William Hazeltine is an entomologist who until his recent retirement headed he Hutte County, California Mosquito Abatement Program. He is a frequent commentator on environmental affairs.

All of these connections to anti-nature, chlorine (DDT is a chlorine product) or tobacco funded, are environmental deceptions solidly linked to one man. Several Tobacco documents are not as clear. Hazelton was in Europe for the 1993 ICSE Heidelberg Appeal fake-science meeting, and he did run a lab and do experiments.

Further investigation is required to solidly link this Hazeltine to other spellings found in tobacco documents. There is even a possibility that a business name using a varied spelling was used to deflect any possibility of connecting him to large sums of money, a couple million dollars to be more exact.

In two draft documents Hazeltine is typed on a page, and hand-writing has scratch through that and inserted Hazelton. In a third it is left as original, Hazeltine. The subject of the letters is lab tests for a project known as CIAR.

CIAR is another fraudulent science smokescreen, like the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution phoney report "Science, Economics, and Environmental Policy: a Critical Examination", and the whole "Whitecoats Project" that was going on throughout this time period.

It does not come through clearly exactly what the "Hazelton study results" are, but the spelling is not the same as our man but is the same as two other documents where Hazeltine was changed to Hazelton. The time period is consistent with Hazeltine's active conspiracy, and the subject matter is in his department.

This 1990 document discuses a Hazelton laboratory results from an apparent British laboratory on organophosphate pesticide residues, which is in Hazeltine's specialty, but there is no corroboration that this Hazeltine was working in Britain for a number of years as Hazelton or Hazeltine.

Since the man is dead, it makes little sense in pinning more crimes on him than is necessary to prove that he was completely corrupt to the core as proved by the previous document citations.

The point of this exercise has been to nail each and every single associate to AdTI's contribution to the tobacco consortium's Whitecoats Project deception operation of 1994, because there are still living bad guys out there who need to be nailed.

S. Fred Singer is still allowed to dispute Global Warming science, even so far as continuing to offer testimony to congress, when he was corrupt and every single associate of his was corrupt at one moment in time where evidence gathered from secret files of the tobacco company can prove it. If ever there are similar criminal conspiracy trials of the chlorine, pesticide, coal, oil & gas companies, I am sure there would be interesting documents surface, but that is not required to prove the permanent lifelong untrustworthyness of S. Fred Singer.

Following these trails it shall be possible, one by one, to dismantle the fake-science smokescreens and deception tactics about chemical pollution, biotech frauds, global warming lies causing immanent harm to our planet.

The AdTI organization recently attacked community-spirited free software production on behest of its client Microsoft, whom is not satisfied to have more money than they know how to spend. AdTI should not be there to offer corrupt services to Microsoft, because the evidence of AdTI's illegal lobbying for tobacco clients is on the internet. Getting rid of AdTI is one purpose served by looking at William Hazeltine.

Another reason to know the utter corruption of Hazeltine and every member of Singer's 1994 Whitecoats team is to be able to demonstrate that still living people, like the Dean of Rochester Institute of Technology served on a corrupt project with corrupt people and could not have failed to know it. Especially when other connections to these members of this group are shown, and connections to other corrupt institutions link people after the fact, demonstrating a continuity of subversive activity as a pattern of behavior.

There is one document which calls into question how much involvement these dispicable scientists actually were in this project:

This document says the report is written and signed off by AdTI execs and authors, they prefer no major rewrite by the tobacco company or else the authors need to approve it all over again before putting their names to it. There was an original section on chlorine which became DDT by the time the report was published. Cesar Conda (AdTI) is asking for names, wants ten but would settle for six. The final report has 19, plus the authors, plus the senior AdTI staff.

If it wasn't for other pieces of evidence of corruption connected to the names of this group, there might be a temptation to think that they had nothing to actually do with it -- they got a phone call, asked if it would be ok to list them as peer-reviewers (who is ever going to know, right), and they may never have even seen the report before or after it was published. Like Hazeltine above, his appearance at the "Heidelberg Appeal" International Center for Scientific Ecology, was on the same program with Gerhard Stohrer, who has his own dossier of corrupt history. As tempting as it may be to dismiss culpibility on the evidence of this one Tobacco Institute document, the weight of the whole evidence is out there showing something dirty they tried to hide.

I leave you with William Hazeltine's voice from the grave...

"One of America's greatest medical researchers, Dr. William Hazeltine, has found that small amounts of DDT actually lower the risk of leukemia and breast cancer in lab animals. (The animals appeared so much healthier, lab technicians started referring to this miracle compound as 'vitamin DDT.')"

Powered by Blogger